日本語AIでPubMedを検索
歯根端切除術が単根歯の生体力学的反応に及ぼす影響-パート2:歯根端切除術と歯周骨欠損の併用
Influence of apical root resection on the biomechanical response of a single-rooted tooth-part 2: apical root resection combined with periodontal bone loss.
PMID: 25576200
抄録
序論:
本研究では、歯根端切除術を受けた歯が、様々な程度の歯周骨量減少を伴うことが多い。本研究の目的は、歯根端切除と歯周骨量の減少が単根歯の生体力学的反応に及ぼす影響を評価することである。
INTRODUCTION: In a clinical situation, an apically resected tooth is often accompanied by a varying degree of periodontal bone loss. The purpose of this study was to assess the influence of apical root resection combined with periodontal bone loss on the biomechanical response of a single-rooted tooth.
研究方法:
数値解析のために,上中切歯の基本的な無傷のモデルと基本的な頂部切除モデルを選択した.それぞれの基本モデルから,異なる量の歯周骨欠損(0,0.5,1,1.5,2,3 mm)を想定した6つのモデルを作成した.それぞれの条件について,最大フォンミーゼス応力(σmax),最大歯牙変位(ΔRmax),有効歯冠根面比(α)を算出した.
METHODS: A basic intact model and a basic apically resected model of the upper central incisor were selected for the numerical analysis. From each basic model, 6 models were developed assuming different amounts of periodontal bone loss (0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, and 3 mm). Maximum von Mises stress (σ max), maximum tooth displacement (ΔR max), and effective crown-to-root ratio (α) were calculated for each condition.
結果:
歯が正常な歯根膜で支えられている場合,無傷のモデルと歯根膜切除モデルの生体力学的反応にはわずかな差しかなかった(σmaxに2.1%,ΔRmaxに16.9%の差).しかし,歯根膜の破壊を想定した場合,無傷のモデルと歯根膜切除モデルの反応は異なっていた。その差は歯根膜の欠損が進むにつれて大きくなり、歯根膜の欠損が3mmになると、σmaxで68.7%、ΔRmaxで56.3%の差が生じた(α=0.48)。
RESULTS: There were only marginal differences (a 2.1% difference in σ max and a 16.9% difference in ΔR max) between the biomechanical responses of the intact model and the apically resected model when the tooth was supported by a normal periodontium. However, when destruction of the periodontium was assumed, the intact model and the apically resected model responded differently. The difference increased as the periodontal bone loss progressed, resulting in a 68.7% difference in σ max and a 56.3% difference in ΔR max when the periodontal bone loss increased to 3 mm (α = 0.48).
おわりに:
歯槽骨を切除した歯は、正常な歯周組織に支えられているときには比較的安定した生体応答を示したが、歯槽骨の喪失が進むにつれて、無傷の歯と比較してより悪化した応答を示すようになった。
CONCLUSIONS: Although the biomechanical response of an apically resected tooth was relatively stable when the tooth was supported by a normal periodontium, the apically resected tooth showed a more deteriorated response compared with the intact tooth as the periodontal bone loss progressed.