日本語AIでPubMedを検索
キレート剤と次亜塩素酸ナトリウムを交互に根管に灌注することが、スミア層除去の効果に及ぼす影響
The effects of alternate irrigation of root canals with chelating agents and sodium hypochlorite on the effectiveness of smear layer removal.
PMID: 32101646
抄録
背景:
根管を機械的に準備した後、根管壁はスミア層で覆われる。象牙細管を深く洗浄するためには、スミア層の除去が推奨される。キレート剤を用いた洗浄や、キレート剤と次亜塩素酸ナトリウム(NaOCl)を交互に用いた灌流の時間の長さについては意見が一致していない。
BACKGROUND: After the mechanical preparation of a root canal, the canal walls are covered with a smear layer. In order to deeply clean the dentinal tubules, removal of the smear layer is recommended. There is no consensus on the length of time of rinsing with chelating agents or irrigation with alternating chelating agents and sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl).
研究の目的:
本研究の目的は、4種類の灌流プロトコルを用いてスミア層除去の効果を評価することである。
OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of smear layer removal using 4 irrigation protocols.
材料と方法:
ISO40/04サイズのストレート根管42本を準備し,4つの研究グループ(n = 10)と対照グループ(n = 2)に割り当てた。対照群では5.25%NaOClで180秒,第1群では40%クエン酸(CA)で60秒,NaOClで120秒,第2群ではCAで120秒,NaOClで120秒,第3群ではCAで30秒,NaOClで30秒,CAで30秒,NaOClで120秒,第4群ではCAで60秒,NaOClで30秒,CAで60秒,NaOClで120秒,とした.根を長手方向に分割し,根管を200~500倍で観察した。根尖から2mm,6mm,10mmの範囲で根管壁を分析した。
MATERIAL AND METHODS: We prepared 42 straight root canals to size ISO40/04 and assigned them into 4 study groups (n = 10) and a control group (n = 2). The root canals were irrigated as follows: in the control group, 180 s with 5.25% NaOCl; in group 1, 60 s with 40% citric acid (CA) and 120 s with NaOCl; in group 2, 120 s with CA and 120 s with NaOCl; in group 3, 30 s CA, 30 s with NaOCl, 30 s CA and 120 s with NaOCl; and in group 4, 60 s with CA, 30 s with NaOCl, 60 s with CA, and 120 s with NaOCl. The roots were split longitudinally and the root canals were observed under ×200-500 magnification. The root canal walls were analyzed in areas 2 mm, 6 mm and 10 mm from the apex.
結果:
根尖部と内側部では,3群と4群で最も高い効果が得られた。冠状面では、実験群間に有意な差は認められなかった。
RESULTS: In the apical and medial sections, the best effects were achieved in groups 3 and 4. In coronal sections, no significant differences between experimental groups were found.
結論:
本研究の制限内では,NaOClとCAを交互に用いた灌流は,灌流時間にかかわらずスミア層の除去に最も効果的であると結論付けられる。
CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that irrigation with alternating NaOCl and CA was the most effective at smear layer removal, regardless of the irrigation time.