日本語AIでPubMedを検索
歯内療法後に修復された5Y-PSZジルコニアクラウンの耐破壊性.
Fracture Resistance of Repaired 5Y-PSZ Zirconia Crowns after Endodontic Access.
PMID: 36975573
抄録
本研究では,トレパニングを行い,コンポジットレジンで修復したジルコニアクラウンの咀嚼シミュレーション前後の破断荷重を分析した.全体で3グループ、各グループに5Y-PSZクラウン15本で試験を行った。A群では,未修飾のクラウンの破断荷重を評価した.B群では,クラウンをトレパニングし,コンポジットレジンで修復した後,破折試験を行った.C群では,B群と同様に歯冠を作製したが,最終的な破壊試験の前にサーモメカニカルサイクルを実施した.平均破壊荷重と標準偏差は,2260 N ± 410 N(A 群),1720 N ± 380 N(B 群),1540 N ± 280 N(C 群)であった.Tukey-Kramerによる多重比較では、A群とB群(<0.01)、A群とC群(<0.01)の間に有意差が見られた。経年変化後、SEMにより表面の亀裂が検出されたが、XRMにより咬頭から歯冠内側に達する亀裂は検出されなかった。本研究の限界の範囲内で,トレパネーションとコンポジットレペアを施した5Y-PSZ冠は,トレパネーションを施さない5Y-PSZ冠よりも低い破折荷重を示すと言える.
This study analyzed the fracture load before and after a chewing simulation of zirconia crowns that were trepanned and repaired using composite resin. Overall, 3 groups with 15 5Y-PSZ crowns in each group were tested. For group A, the fracture load of the unmodified crowns was evaluated. For group B, the crowns were trepanned and repaired using composite resin, also followed by a fracture test. For group C, crowns were prepared like in group B but received thermomechanical cycling before the final fracture tests. Furthermore, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and X-ray microscopy (XRM) analysis were performed for group C. The mean fracture loads and standard deviation were 2260 N ± 410 N (group A), 1720 N ± 380 N (group B), and 1540 N ± 280 N (group C). Tukey-Kramer multiple comparisons showed a significant difference between groups A and B ( < 0.01) and groups A and C ( < 0.01). After ageing, surface fissures were detected via SEM, but no cracks that reached from the occlusal to the inner side of the crown were detected via XRM. Within the limitations of this study, it can be stated that trepanned and composite-repaired 5Y-PSZ crowns show lower fracture loads than 5Y-PSZ crowns without trepanation.